From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2782 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Two questions on Context Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:49:49 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20000921124949.009148b0@pop.wxs.nl> References: <39C9DB77.BCE2A233@econ.muni.cz> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393555 11772 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:19:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Context Original-To: Michal Kvasnicka In-Reply-To: <39C9DB77.BCE2A233@econ.muni.cz> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2782 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2782 At 11:57 AM 9/21/00 +0200, Michal Kvasnicka wrote: >Dear friends, > >let me ask these simple questions: > >1) Is \em just a font switch, or is it macro? I.e. is it necessary to > write `{\em some text\/}' or is sufficient to write `{\em some >text}'? {\em test {\em test {\bf test \em test}}} the \/ is supposed to be done automatically, \em is a macro >2) How can I find what hyphenation pattern is currently used? top of log. Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------