From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3507 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: unicode in bookmarks Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 18:33:14 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20001201183314.008ee4a0@pop.wxs.nl> References: <3.0.6.32.20001129091246.01766810@pop.wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394240 17685 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:30:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Petr Ferdus In-Reply-To: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3507 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3507 At 05:52 PM 12/1/00 +0100, Petr Ferdus wrote: >On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Hans Hagen wrote: > results. (perhaps now comes the time to extend and apply code >from your first reply, with note example, to proces string feeded to >bookmark). Is it correct? Or did unitable changed situation somehow? For that, the unicode list should be extended, since i defined only a few chars, Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------