From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3634 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: experimenting metafun: problems with funnyframe Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:06:51 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20001221090651.015341c0@pop.wxs.nl> References: <3.0.6.32.20001220093348.01b97e80@pop.wxs.nl> <3.0.6.32.20001219121045.00a6a7f0@pop.wxs.nl> <3.0.6.32.20001220093348.01b97e80@pop.wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394360 18787 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:32:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: "Uwe Koloska" In-Reply-To: <00122017542202.00947@bilbo> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3634 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3634 At 05:54 PM 12/20/00 +0100, Uwe Koloska wrote: >You wrote on Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2000 09:33: >>> [wrong lower gap in a framed box] >>> >>>This looks a bit better, but the lower gap is still visually bigger. >>> >> You can try 1ex instead. > >Ok, I can tweak the value since it looks right. But is it a problem of >framed or funnyframe? Or is it a feature? It depends. I cnnot see your example, but it may be that there is a dangling strut down there. Can you test it with \showstruts Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------