From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3887 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: "Negative" font switches Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:37:20 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010128193720.0093cb40@server-1> References: <000301c087e0$4ce257e0$a3ccfea9@nuovo> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394594 20988 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:36:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: "Giuseppe Bilotta" In-Reply-To: <021801c087e5$c2b3d5c0$a3ccfea9@nuovo> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3887 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3887 At 11:17 PM 1/26/01 +0100, you wrote: >> Giuseppe Bilotta writes: >> >> > Hello, one more request: I would like to see some font switches that act by >> > "nullifying" other switches. An example would explain better: >> > >> > {\bf Some bold {\nobf and some not bold} text} >> > >> > should be equivalent to >> > >> > {\bf Some bold} and some not bold {\bf text} >> >> Could you give a concrete example of a situation where the "\nobf" >> method is easier or clearer than the second method? >> > >No. I see your point: it would always be possible to say > >{\local setups {\bf Some bold} and some not bold {\bf more bold}} > >Ok, maybe it's not needed after all. (Unless I can think of something in the >future ...) there is always \tf to return to the normal font shape Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------