From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3900 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Footnotes in footnotes Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:28:27 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010128232827.00accb60@server-1> References: <3.0.6.32.20010126140527.0156c100@server-1> <005a01c087e1$8e2d51e0$a3ccfea9@nuovo> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394607 21134 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:36:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Taco Hoekwater In-Reply-To: <3A72B5F0.7319C311@quicknet.nl> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3900 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3900 At 12:50 PM 1/27/01 +0100, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > This author has strange requests I guess that you have the largest collection of funny requests -) I think it would be very entertaining of you write an articles on all those cases. >In descriptive text: sometimes I *do* want a footnotemarker in the >text but don't want the footnote itself to be marked, and sometimes >I don't want a footnotemarker but *do* want the footnotes to be >marked. Contexts \footnote[-]{..} cannot do this because the resulting >footnote cannot be referenced to. So, in case one, what should happen to the footnote text? Should is just disappear? are \footnotemark \footnotetext the most natural names for this? Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------