From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3964 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Comments on \defineshortcut Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 18:52:05 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010204185205.01598aa0@server-1> References: <3.0.6.32.20010202100725.019aa100@server-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394665 21691 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:37:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "ConTeXt" Original-To: "Giuseppe Bilotta" In-Reply-To: <008701c08d62$08079540$a3ccfea9@nuovo> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3964 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3964 At 10:47 PM 2/2/01 +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >Maybe then saving should check if the old meaning was already a shortcut ... if >this is doable. sure, stacking is no problem, but then people would ask for non stacked meanings -) btw, your end-of-mail sentence will let the mail archive end up in wrong lookups in search engines, given the popularity of some search terms. Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------