ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Font definition clashing?
@ 2001-02-25 15:37 Johannes Huesing
  2001-02-26  9:11 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Huesing @ 2001-02-25 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)


[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 440 bytes --]

Hi all, 

I installed a font for myself (a clone of Candida) and wrote a ConTeXt
font definition file for it. It doesn't, however seem to go well
together with the definitions in font-eul.tex. The example file shows
the x overstriked by the bar instead of "overbarred". Enclosed you'll
find the small example and my definition file.

Does anybody have any ideas?

Groetjes

Johannes 
-- 
"Human Genome" may be a binary file. See it anyway?

[-- Attachment #2: euler-min.tex --]
[-- Type: text/x-tex, Size: 200 bytes --]

\setupoutput[pdftex]
\setupbodyfont[pos, eul]
\starttext
$$
r_{xy} = \frac{(\sum_{i}x_{i}-\bar{x})(\sum_{i}y_{i}-\bar{y})}
	{\sqrt{\sum_{i}(x_{i}-\bar{x})^{2}\sum_{i}(y_{i}-\bar{y})^{2}}}
$$
\stoptext

[-- Attachment #3: font-cdi.tex --]
[-- Type: text/x-tex, Size: 706 bytes --]

%D \module
%D   [     file=font-5ci,
%D      version=2001.02.25,
%D        title=\CONTEXT\ Font Macros,
%D     subtitle=Palatino,
%D       author=J. Huesing,
%D         date=\currentdate,
%D    copyright=J. Huesing]
%C

%D This file loads the Softmaker Candida. 

\definefontsynonym [Slab-C650-Regular] [5cir8t][encoding=ec]
\definefontsynonym [Slab-C650-Bold]  [5cib8t][encoding=ec]
\definefontsynonym [Slab-C650-Italic][5ciri8t][encoding=ec]

\definefontsynonym [Serif]            [Slab-C650-Regular] 
\definefontsynonym [SerifBold]        [Slab-C650-Bold]  
\definefontsynonym [SerifItalic]      [Slab-C650-Italic]

\definebodyfont [14.4pt,12pt,11pt,10pt,9pt,8pt,7pt,6pt,5pt] [rm] [default]

\endinput 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Font definition clashing?
  2001-02-25 15:37 Font definition clashing? Johannes Huesing
@ 2001-02-26  9:11 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2001-02-26  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: ntg-context

At 04:37 PM 2/25/01 +0100, Johannes Huesing wrote:
>Hi all, 
>
>I installed a font for myself (a clone of Candida) and wrote a ConTeXt
>font definition file for it. It doesn't, however seem to go well
>together with the definitions in font-eul.tex. The example file shows
>the x overstriked by the bar instead of "overbarred". Enclosed you'll
>find the small example and my definition file.
>
>Does anybody have any ideas?

You should explicitly define a 'mr' font

\definebodyfont[12pt][mm][mr=...]

since now euler will use your candida

Hans

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl
                      Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
 tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-02-26  9:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-25 15:37 Font definition clashing? Johannes Huesing
2001-02-26  9:11 ` Hans Hagen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).