* Font definition clashing?
@ 2001-02-25 15:37 Johannes Huesing
2001-02-26 9:11 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Huesing @ 2001-02-25 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 440 bytes --]
Hi all,
I installed a font for myself (a clone of Candida) and wrote a ConTeXt
font definition file for it. It doesn't, however seem to go well
together with the definitions in font-eul.tex. The example file shows
the x overstriked by the bar instead of "overbarred". Enclosed you'll
find the small example and my definition file.
Does anybody have any ideas?
Groetjes
Johannes
--
"Human Genome" may be a binary file. See it anyway?
[-- Attachment #2: euler-min.tex --]
[-- Type: text/x-tex, Size: 200 bytes --]
\setupoutput[pdftex]
\setupbodyfont[pos, eul]
\starttext
$$
r_{xy} = \frac{(\sum_{i}x_{i}-\bar{x})(\sum_{i}y_{i}-\bar{y})}
{\sqrt{\sum_{i}(x_{i}-\bar{x})^{2}\sum_{i}(y_{i}-\bar{y})^{2}}}
$$
\stoptext
[-- Attachment #3: font-cdi.tex --]
[-- Type: text/x-tex, Size: 706 bytes --]
%D \module
%D [ file=font-5ci,
%D version=2001.02.25,
%D title=\CONTEXT\ Font Macros,
%D subtitle=Palatino,
%D author=J. Huesing,
%D date=\currentdate,
%D copyright=J. Huesing]
%C
%D This file loads the Softmaker Candida.
\definefontsynonym [Slab-C650-Regular] [5cir8t][encoding=ec]
\definefontsynonym [Slab-C650-Bold] [5cib8t][encoding=ec]
\definefontsynonym [Slab-C650-Italic][5ciri8t][encoding=ec]
\definefontsynonym [Serif] [Slab-C650-Regular]
\definefontsynonym [SerifBold] [Slab-C650-Bold]
\definefontsynonym [SerifItalic] [Slab-C650-Italic]
\definebodyfont [14.4pt,12pt,11pt,10pt,9pt,8pt,7pt,6pt,5pt] [rm] [default]
\endinput
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Font definition clashing?
2001-02-25 15:37 Font definition clashing? Johannes Huesing
@ 2001-02-26 9:11 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2001-02-26 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ntg-context
At 04:37 PM 2/25/01 +0100, Johannes Huesing wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I installed a font for myself (a clone of Candida) and wrote a ConTeXt
>font definition file for it. It doesn't, however seem to go well
>together with the definitions in font-eul.tex. The example file shows
>the x overstriked by the bar instead of "overbarred". Enclosed you'll
>find the small example and my definition file.
>
>Does anybody have any ideas?
You should explicitly define a 'mr' font
\definebodyfont[12pt][mm][mr=...]
since now euler will use your candida
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-02-26 9:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-25 15:37 Font definition clashing? Johannes Huesing
2001-02-26 9:11 ` Hans Hagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).