From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4242 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Font definition clashing? Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:11:56 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010226101156.0160f460@server-1> References: <20010225163755.A2746@ruhrau.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394924 24075 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:42:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: johannes.huesing@ruhrau.de In-Reply-To: <20010225163755.A2746@ruhrau.de> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4242 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4242 At 04:37 PM 2/25/01 +0100, Johannes Huesing wrote: >Hi all, > >I installed a font for myself (a clone of Candida) and wrote a ConTeXt >font definition file for it. It doesn't, however seem to go well >together with the definitions in font-eul.tex. The example file shows >the x overstriked by the bar instead of "overbarred". Enclosed you'll >find the small example and my definition file. > >Does anybody have any ideas? You should explicitly define a 'mr' font \definebodyfont[12pt][mm][mr=...] since now euler will use your candida Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------