From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4330 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: footnotes Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:08:58 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010312180858.00967d00@server-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395009 24905 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:43:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl, taco@elvenkind.com Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4330 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4330 Hi, The footnote problems as reported have to do with (yet unknown) sync problems. The following seems to work, \appendtoks \synchronizefootnotes \to \everypar \def\synchronizefootnotes% {\ifvoid\footins\else\insert\footins{\unvbox\footins}\fi} but, before i experiment with this i want to know taco's/thanh's (they who knows the deeper internals of tex the program) opinion on potential interferences. Anyone is free to experiment -) Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------