From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4586 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: No \aring? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:03:03 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010424090303.019894c0@server-1> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395241 26979 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:47:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Joop Susan In-Reply-To: <20010423151136.2673.qmail@crux.private.off-line> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4586 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4586 At 05:11 PM 4/23/01 +0200, Joop Susan wrote: >Now: >This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-14h-released-20010417-2.1 (Web2C 7.3.3.1) >ConTeXt ver: 2001.4.9 fmt: 2001.4.23 int: english mes: english > >Are ConTeXt Betas always against the latest pdftex snapshots? recently pdftex didn't change that much [apart from protruding and hz support], but version 14 is better than 13 in producing solid pdf code Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------