From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4599 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Dots Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:06:54 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010426100654.01b902d0@server-1> References: <200104241744.f3OHi0110662@merkur.econ.muni.cz> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395252 27057 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:47:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ConTeXt mailing list Original-To: AlterEgo Qasars In-Reply-To: <200104241744.f3OHi0110662@merkur.econ.muni.cz> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4599 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4599 At 07:44 PM 4/24/01 +0200, AlterEgo Qasars wrote: >Good evening to you all! > >I haven't cought the result of the debate on \dots. Is there any \dots >command that is dependent on the used font? >Or should I make for myself? It may be rather trivial (according to >plain TeX) but systemic solution may be preferable. not yet, but taco and i are working on it [mixed math symbol sets and so], but we can only release it with the new math module which has to/will support the new font/encoding/math. Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------