From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4772 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re[2]: Environments, Projects, Products, Components Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 10:11:24 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010531101124.01a48500@server-1> References: <3B150E38.6060605@elvenkind.com> <15816128813.20010530134008@bigfoot.com> <3B150E38.6060605@elvenkind.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395413 28652 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:50:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Giuseppe Bilotta In-Reply-To: <25874768.20010530200158@bigfoot.com> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4772 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4772 At 08:01 PM 5/30/01 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >I see. Hadn't thought of that ... which do you think is the better >idea? taking \product off is space-saving (only one file per >chapter, instead of two wrappers plus the file), but somehow seems >less structuring ... maybe I'd better keep \product in until I >need to use the same file somewhere else ... > >What happens if product booka meets a component that says \product >bookb? there are also locale env's that can be loaded per product so in that case you may waqnt the directive so that context can backtract the doc tree. some day this will be more extensive [split doc processing and auto cross doc/toc refs and so] Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------