From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4789 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Itemizations Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 10:30:15 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010605103015.01ad99e0@server-1> References: <1864931074.20010604104059@bigfoot.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395429 28740 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:50:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Giuseppe Bilotta In-Reply-To: <1864931074.20010604104059@bigfoot.com> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4789 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4789 At 10:40 AM 6/4/01 +0200, you wrote: >Hello, I have two questions on itemizations > >First question: assume that I have an itemization > >1. foo >2. bar >3. baz >4. quuz > >and that I lately want to expand baz and quuz. This means that in >another itemization I would have > >3. baz > a. one > b. two > c. and three >4. quuz > a. another > b. and another > c. ok > >How could I tell the second itemization to start at 3, possibly >linking it to the actual number of baz (so that if baz changes >position, the numbers are always in sync)? \startitemize[continue] >Second question: can I have "running" itemization? Like (1) This >is item 1 and (2) this is item two. see berends answer, add a [ref] Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------