From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4905 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: al gevonden \defineXMLpickup werkt wel Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 23:34:37 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010630233437.0104b4d0@server-1> References: <87ae2p3n3z.fsf@dellius.nederware.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395539 29751 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:52:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Berend de Boer In-Reply-To: <87ae2p3n3z.fsf@dellius.nederware.nl> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4905 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4905 At 07:15 PM 6/30/01 +0200, Berend de Boer wrote: >Voor het verschil tussen beide zie mijn vraag in de mailing list. pickup can be used with delimited macros, like in \def\blabla#1\end{...} pickup -> {\blabla} {\end} In the xml manual you can find an example of table handling: \bTR \bTD \eTD \eTR can in principle be handled by pickups, but how about nested tables? there nested pickups are your friend [little code but tricky macros btw] Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------