From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9818 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[3]: About itemize Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:08:08 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <301726853.20021112150808@iol.it> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021112002309.031bcd80@remote-1> <200211111314.39547.ishamid@attbi.com> <200211111314.39547.ishamid@attbi.com> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112002309.031bcd80@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112091240.02e2e0f0@server-1> Reply-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037117593 5947 80.91.224.249 (12 Nov 2002 16:13:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Bdf5-0001Xd-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:13:11 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24F310AF0; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:14:50 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from smtp2.libero.it (smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E2F10AF0 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:12:15 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from [151.29.129.76] (151.29.129.76) by smtp2.libero.it (6.5.028) id 3DCC0031001CA4C7; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:12:03 +0100 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20021112091240.02e2e0f0@server-1> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9818 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9818 Tuesday, November 12, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: HH> At 12:46 AM 11/12/2002 +0100, you wrote: >>Maybe we may want to have a per-startstop option >>(obeypars=true,obeypars=false) together/in place of the global >>\obeypars/\noobeypars (or \obeyparstrue/\obeyparsfalse). >> >>Let's say that the best thing (again IMO) is to have a global >>option, overridable in each startstop: the obeypars key in >>startstops would then accept the values true (force true), false >>(force false), default (behave according to the global setting). >> >>Does this sound sensible? HH> hm, tricky, in many cases start/stop can be anything, not just skips and so Would it really be that tricky? It should just decide wether to skip the next \par or not ... HH> concerning redudancy: what's wrong with that? it gives you much more HH> control and suits today's way of coding Awfully verbose. Wrist-heavy. Definitely not the way to go (btw that's the reason why I *hate* XML). It *requires* a tuned editor which will insert the code for you, to reach the same productivity level. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta