From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/41783 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alan Stone" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Geeze, I might try Linux after all... (not too off-tpic I hope) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:17:28 +0200 Message-ID: <326847810806200117y3a98e1ddlb6594b5c088ce83d@mail.gmail.com> References: <326847810806130328k73f9ed0bw4ec3ede296a29d55@mail.gmail.com> <326847810806140029x446fd539w8e54fefea57de4f0@mail.gmail.com> <4853760A.20109@elvenkind.com> <200806140725.12219.john@wexfordpress.com> <326847810806191240y180c1e90tc92a8039a85ca804@mail.gmail.com> <6faad9f00806200003s57f528aahf6729ee562297a11@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0311821150==" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213950178 22990 80.91.229.12 (20 Jun 2008 08:22:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:22:58 +0000 (UTC) To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Jun 20 10:23:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K9buB-0007yK-2P for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:23:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A3D1FD8E; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:22:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23233-02; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:22:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7081FCF6; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:18:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324A01FCF6 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:18:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21289-06-6 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:17:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com (gv-out-0910.google.com [216.239.58.189]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6C01FCF5 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:17:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l14so223601gvf.1 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.210.10.8 with SMTP id 8mr2750746ebj.171.1213949848067; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.210.136.3 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:17:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6faad9f00806200003s57f528aahf6729ee562297a11@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:41783 Archived-At: --===============0311821150== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6252_9037759.1213949848062" ------=_Part_6252_9037759.1213949848062 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I don't understand. Please explain... (1) >You cannot update the binaries that way (you are not supposed to :). Why can't the binaries be updated that way (why aren't we supposed to) ? (2) >On your own risk, you may update the binaries from minimals > rsync -av \ > rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/current/bin/xetex/linux/bin/ \ > /path/to/bin/with/xetex Why on your own risk ? Thanks a lot for clearing up the mist, Alan On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Mojca Miklavec < mojca.miklavec.lists@gmail.com> wrote: > You cannot update the binaries that way (you are not supposed to :). > > On your own risk, you may update the binaries from minimals > rsync -av \ > rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/current/bin/xetex/linux/bin/ \ > /path/to/bin/with/xetex > > Mojca > > ------=_Part_6252_9037759.1213949848062 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I don't understand. Please explain...

(1) >You cannot update the binaries that way (you are not supposed to :).

Why can't the binaries be updated that way (why aren't we supposed to) ?


(2) >On your own risk, you may update the binaries from minimals
>   rsync -av \
>   rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/current/bin/xetex/linux/bin/ \
>   /path/to/bin/with/xetex

Why on your own risk ?


Thanks a lot for clearing up the mist,
Alan


On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
You cannot update the binaries that way (you are not supposed to :).

On your own risk, you may update the binaries from minimals
   rsync -av \
   rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/current/bin/xetex/linux/bin/ \
   /path/to/bin/with/xetex

Mojca

------=_Part_6252_9037759.1213949848062-- --===============0311821150== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --===============0311821150==--