From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/47677 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Stone Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: reducing compile time Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:26:03 +0100 Message-ID: <326847810902231226v63744395y56374cec7f10b8eb@mail.gmail.com> References: <326847810902230916j8b11aacq95a8db16ccbc8024@mail.gmail.com> <326847810902231157kc49bd83i8df988abc0ee28be@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2050488758==" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235421048 22735 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2009 20:30:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:30:48 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Feb 23 21:32:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LbhSw-0002Eg-1q for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:31:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CA81FD5A; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:30:26 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19862-04-5; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:29:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FB01FD09; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:29:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6411FD09 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:29:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21570-02 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:28:25 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (filter2-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.70]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0373A1FCE9 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:26:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1NKQ394000319 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:26:03 +0100 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g16so412913nfd.44 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:26:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pp3T6D2XxYab4GhAWxqi04qfnFIhwconS/0gv7Em9qo=; b=YborWL4rSf8raip5LQTPADJq1q6wK5kyxN8qUFozuKIH1fC+jALfj83uPHtHQnyNW3 dlLGtLgLqABi76qXI/KkPsCW7zNIfh9R1q58nQtJRW9mGun2c1rR2OZEf3I2UKZ8COvG /PsIvKsSFWC2ZasTwpZ6y3cMfGRWr9i7S9f/A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lgiFo4qpV+N3wzIrEg3i3qIAUm0n5BlzQp5/VNbzz7TK0fbXdLH5FgvIRuIHHf4+cW i8KLssfkkl798xRhY4bd7pGG2VpHWof2C1nxy4zV5xLBo8go7TMTMAYVAVMnpP+kt5rP rj3XSmvSVIFnfVq3/XkA6z1kbBZUW+LAudtnw= Original-Received: by 10.210.34.19 with SMTP id h19mr3712639ebh.163.1235420763315; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:26:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <326847810902231157kc49bd83i8df988abc0ee28be@mail.gmail.com> X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=64.233.182.188; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 184138725 - f22ebf7b044d X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.70 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:47677 Archived-At: --===============2050488758== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c3d16beddbf04639bcf65 --0015174c3d16beddbf04639bcf65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Alan Stone wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Wolfgang Schuster < > schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> >> Am 23.02.2009 um 18:16 schrieb Alan Stone: >> >> - does using \doifundefined{myMacro}{...} shorten tex runs/compile time ? >>> >> >> In which way? > > > As I don't know/understand what happens between (Lua)TeX runs, to keep > macro definitions in memory. > Correction: to avoid spending time redefining macros in case their definitions are kept in memory between Lua(TeX) runs. > > > - what are the features to avoid for shortest compile times ? >> >> Depends on your document and what do you want. > > > My question was intended in a generic way, aka if you use > > - these features ... expect longer or significant longer compile times, or > - these features ... generate the longest compile times. > > >> To give you a better answer speak in complete sentences. >> >> Wolfgang >> >> --0015174c3d16beddbf04639bcf65 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Alan Stone <software.list.1es9s@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> wrote:

Am 23.02.2009 um 18:16 schrieb Alan Stone:


- does using \doifundefined{myMacro}{...} shorten tex runs/compile time ?

In which way?

As I don't know/understand what happens between (Lua)TeX runs, to keep macro definitions in memory.
 
Correction: to avoid spending time redefining macros in case their definitions are kept in memory between Lua(TeX) runs.
 


- what are the features to avoid for shortest compile times ?

Depends on your document and what do you want.

My question was intended in a generic way, aka if you use

- these features ... expect longer or significant longer compile times, or
- these features ... generate the longest compile times.
 
To give you a better answer speak in complete sentences.

Wolfgang


--0015174c3d16beddbf04639bcf65-- --===============2050488758== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --===============2050488758==--