Re: directsetup vs setups

[Hans Hagen via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>]

On 11/15/2021 7:06 PM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:

> On your empty performance test, I get around 0.10, .11, .08 for direct, 
> and 0.4 for fast. With the grouped styling, those balloon to 0.50, 0.56, 
> 0.48, and 0.44.
just for the record, here with lmtx i get (on a 2013 laptop):

0.128 0.130 0.114 0.057
0.686 0.674 0.660 0.602

while mkiv does:

0.211 0.224 0.131 0.055
0.763 0.767 0.677 0.597

(normally one will use at least a million tests because th elast digot 
is kind of meaningless; also the used compiler matters)

but i bet that on an average job our machines don't perform too 
different (simple tests like these are happily using the cpu cache)

it's not that easy to make tex jobs run faster but also not that hard to 
make them run slower, which i try to avoid -)

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________