From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/25
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Taco Hoekwater <Taco.Hoekwater@wkap.nl>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: Context overzetten naar TeTeX-tree
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 07:46:34 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <33507.3423259475$1042425057@news.gmane.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035390883 20384 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:34:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:34:43 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl, TEX-NL <TEX-NL@NIC.SURFNET.NL>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:25
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:25

>   #!/bin/sh
>   pdftex -fmt=`basename $0` -progname=context "$@"
> 
> That would allow to do:
>   cont-nl -ini cont-nl
>   cont-nl somefile

The idea looks very smart to me, but a tiny C wrapper is probably 
better because the win32 web2c doesn't have /bin/sh. Also, I am 
wondering whether Hans can give us a calling convention for the 
various format files/executables:

        tex     cont-nl   ??
	etex    econt-nl  ??
        pdftex  pcont-nl  ??

I have all of those, and these happen to be the names I use, but if 
Hans has a different scheme at Pragma I'd prefer to use that.

Taco