Is alternative=serried broken in enumerations?

Is alternative=serried broken in enumerations?

[Janne Junnila]

Hi!

I'm using the current beta, and I get the following error when trying to use alternative=serried. (The minimal example is included in the error message.)

<error>
system          > tex > error on line 6 in file test.tex: Undefined control sequence ...

 1     \defineenumeration[myenumeration][alternative=serried]
 2     
 3     \starttext
 4     
 5     \startmyenumeration
 6 >>  This is a test.
 7     \stopmyenumeration
 8     
 9     \stoptext
10     


\12>:144>:serried ...onstructionlocationparameter 
                                                  \c!width }\doifsetupselse ...
\139>construction ...parameter \c!renderingsetup }
                                                  \relax \dostoptagged \dost...
\dodogotopar ...andler \v!construction \endcsname 
                                                  \BeforePar \emptytoks 
<to be read again> 
                   T
l.6 T
     his is a test.
</error>

Any ideas?

- Janne Junnila
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Is alternative=serried broken in enumerations?

[Wolfgang Schuster]

Am 22.02.2012 um 16:51 schrieb Janne Junnila:

> Hi!
> 
> I'm using the current beta, and I get the following error when trying to use alternative=serried. (The minimal example is included in the error message.)
> 
> <error>
> system          > tex > error on line 6 in file test.tex: Undefined control sequence ...
> 
> 1     \defineenumeration[myenumeration][alternative=serried]
> 2     
> 3     \starttext
> 4     
> 5     \startmyenumeration
> 6 >>  This is a test.
> 7     \stopmyenumeration
> 8     
> 9     \stoptext
> 10     
> 
> 
> \12>:144>:serried ...onstructionlocationparameter 
>                                                  \c!width }\doifsetupselse ...
> \139>construction ...parameter \c!renderingsetup }
>                                                  \relax \dostoptagged \dost...
> \dodogotopar ...andler \v!construction \endcsname 
>                                                  \BeforePar \emptytoks 
> <to be read again> 
>                   T
> l.6 T
>     his is a test.
> </error>
> 
> Any ideas?

strc-con.mkvi

\startsetups[\??constructionrenderings:\v!serried]
-   \edef\p_width{\constructionlocationparameter\c!width}% CHECK ! ! ! wrong parameter namespace
+   \edef\p_width{\constructionparameter\c!width}% CHECK ! ! ! wrong parameter namespace
    \doifsetupselse{\??constructionrenderings:\v!serried:\p_width} {
        \directsetup{\??constructionrenderings:\v!serried:\p_width}
    } {
        \directsetup{\??constructionrenderings:\v!serried:\v!wide}
    }
\stopsetups

Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________