is there a reason not to fix this bug?

* is there a reason not to fix this bug?
@ 2012-03-10 20:57 Pablo Rodríguez
  2012-03-12  7:58 ` Hans Hagen
  2012-03-12  7:59 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Rodríguez @ 2012-03-10 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

Dear community,

Wolfgang kindly suggested this fix (that works also with beta from today):

strc-lst.mkvi:

\def\strc_lists_place_indeed#tag#list#settings%
  {\begingroup
   \edef\currentlist{#tag}%
   \setupcurrentlist[#settings]%
   \the\everystructurelist
 % \doif{\listparameter\c!coupling}\v!on{\startlistreferences{#tag}}%
   \doplacestructurelist % maybe inline
     {#list}%
     {\listparameter\c!criterium}%
     {\listparameter\c!number}%
     {\listparameter\c!extras}%
     {\listparameter\c!order}%
 % \stoplistreferences
+  \par
   \endgroup
   \strc_lists_set_mode}

to fix the following bug with beta (first item on content
list is indented, but the second isn't):

\setuplist[chapter][alternative=d,margin=2em]
\starttext
\completecontent
\part{Part}
\chapter{Chapter}
a
\part{Part}
\chapter{Chapter}
b
\stoptext

I'm probably missing something, but this was reported two betas ago and
I reported this again on the previous beta.

I don't know whether this bug might not be fixed due to other reasons or
it was simply forgotten.

Many thanks for your awesome work,

Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread