From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/22530 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Henning Hraban Ramm Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: lilypond inclusion Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:37:52 +0200 Message-ID: <34FA5046-6B82-41A7-9C7C-7187B6AAAAD2@fiee.net> References: <432943A2.1040008@creutzig.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126831114 29470 80.91.229.2 (16 Sep 2005 00:38:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Sep 16 02:38:29 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EG4Es-0002rZ-6l for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:38:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5A912817; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:38:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15570-07; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:37:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79FB12824; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:37:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEAB12824 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:37:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15569-03-2 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:37:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEC912817 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:37:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from 150.28.79.83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.79.28.150] (helo=[10.128.9.3]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKxQS-1EG4Ej2GCG-0000sN; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:37:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:033f42bdb3cd4a3c9b0966e414a370c7 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on smtp.ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:22530 Archived-At: Am 2005-09-15 um 23:00 schrieb andrea valle: > I love both lilypond and context. > In my last project (thanks to which I substantially started using =20 > both in a decent way) I included in metafun code 250 PDFs fragments =20= > made by lily. > Perfect result. > So, I was asking myself: is lily direct inclusion in context so =20 > relevant? Why? > Just for my curiosity. How did you get your LilyPond fragments? The only way I know would be to cut them from whole PDF pages with =20 Acrobat. But I'm only a newbie (and I don't really feel like learning Scheme). I expect all the nasty work to be done by some script/program, similar to the LilyPond integration with LaTeX. Gr=FC=DFlis vom Hraban! --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://contextgarden.net http://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)