From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
Cc: "'ntg-context@ntg.nl'" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Footnote rules
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 09:22:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35C01F48.62051A93@wxs.nl> (raw)
Berend de Boer wrote:
> What rules does context use in setting footnotes? In a \startopsomming
> .\stopopsomming I've used two footnotes. This construction is printed at
> the bottom of the page. For two footnotes doesn't seem to be enough space.
> Context moves both footnotes to the next page.
>
> I would have expected that at least one footnote remained at the first
> page. But maybe it's more logical to have consecutive footnotes together.
>
> Footnotes will be removed from this document (they just serve as temporary
> comments not to forget things...), but I was wondering what algorithm
> context uses.
The current mechanism is a compromis. When possible, footnotes are
treated directly, which means that they are taken into account directly,
but sometimes (e.g. in tables, they are postponed, which can lead to
assynchronous placement. Take a look at core-not for some examples. You
can also switch to local footnotes and place them local, think of
footnotes in a table, that you want to attach to a table.
In your case, placement can interfere with the fact that breaking pages
in itemizations is optimized in a second pass (no single itemized line
at the end/top of a page).
The main probloem is not the mechanism, but the fact that TeX lacks some
mode tests (fuzzy \ifinner etc), which we already discussed with the
etex team.
If you run:
texexec --modu core-not
you get more documentation (I sent you core-mod.zip a few days back).
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | mail: pragma@wxs.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~1998-07-30 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-07-30 7:22 Hans Hagen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-07-29 17:32 Berend de Boer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35C01F48.62051A93@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).