From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/106470 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schuster Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Second derivative '' Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:09:46 +0100 Message-ID: <3607f940-6c01-d020-42ab-8b2290cbecf0@gmail.com> References: <3614E026-4048-48D0-8CB0-D0E1CDA78365@indiana.edu> <20ed174f-cb1b-5fa1-d6d2-c61535ed7fbc@xs4all.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6660033041471637666==" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="62805"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.12 To: mailing list for ConTeXt users , "Mikael P. Sundqvist" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Mar 05 21:10:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from zapf.boekplan.nl ([5.39.185.232] helo=zapf.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j9wot-000GGD-Be for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 21:10:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A9A182766; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:09:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-vyzWZBdLsn; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:09:48 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFC1182725; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:09:48 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C509182579 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:09:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynxNSB4O3ZeT for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:09:47 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.128.50; helo=mail-wm1-f50.google.com; envelope-from=wolfgang.schuster.lists@gmail.com; receiver= Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (mail-wm1-f50.google.com [209.85.128.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECD6182567 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 21:09:47 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id j1so7091247wmi.4 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:09:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=aEwjGWxe5mMQCNfx38uLGC7viTBYfpm28TfYYOuNJMU=; b=OkDuKeslvYMc05CokHDzu+0sgFV7mInFxXMbwqHoYaVBfG/NtNSNI0FIG7+uR0bN3e UciDKXVP+hWZPkJiOCmjmkRN6d4TBImrs+C+x9pn14Uon/TMJLy1MN6R7X37WkG9P4Hm SFuhNsQxdmxg0p8MtJUIa5CO5hsXsmAzcTGuBpDIO13luSVOVg4/ChveWd3gWDUHxarm bLjHESVcDdR3P7BnRwE/7VqpUrFlVdBZGNuWn4z4QA7zskXO6q6MSZB0R/Yo/8BrjdEq BD8S559H71OjhFdQHlS7jSyNaDNzh3fAmRA1tKjztuwlCSWm4B5ckQ3XZBMP7QssBjIz emVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=aEwjGWxe5mMQCNfx38uLGC7viTBYfpm28TfYYOuNJMU=; b=bU6TRdvNj5MzXEsRQrPBsQD09etyWDvPtDOnTrGfVjqNnJhbzKSDglZspW1lm7JxsQ uFfKnqxIPl1i/PV1yM7zv4e4BNDAaQyWgk2NoOYleMlt/1C3NOcEFW3zgsQ5UOTBmjSc f72hJdWYg/WStk/AdvU8r0KJhtoJejLgeHf2tD3WpOCZwUCJ2+fGNtxn9pFP0/c7vArv lSKiSK+04Vnl7uiT0N2H0bGzVYdw7bb0L7OlLaqFL7ypA9vt2uf0arwiCWkgyV7drJ0Z ZATpBHdC/kYBQE6gXOy8KJwbOHR+KIPJQIiuOnDi7nTNDf5iPf34eTv0rsOb+M4ZAMap t0sA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1itDfluSjDMv3w3IrqCzm2l38bGt5RNCLKI9fFQG4Ok8SzTyCN N67uwjas5PPmuSfVjfnTwAc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuUO7BKSSp6CW4P4aR5bH7zIWKHoqhBDzv7/XgcBzrIqg1R4ZhzIFxZZ1R2zZnc1REeoMf4bQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7c07:: with SMTP id x7mr420274wmc.149.1583438987354; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:09:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.4] (x5f753a36.dyn.telefonica.de. [95.117.58.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm10588888wmk.31.2020.03.05.12.09.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:09:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: "ntg-context" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.comp.tex.context:106470 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============6660033041471637666== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------21F673E82DCC25E2BE1BC48E" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------21F673E82DCC25E2BE1BC48E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mikael P. Sundqvist schrieb am 05.03.2020 um 20:48: > Oh, I had not. It looks better with collapsing=1, indeed. A few neq > questions comes to me: > > Does ConTeXt not use the same prime character as in TeX/LaTeX? Or has > something changed in latin modern? See the attached pdf files > (derivatives.pdf from ConTeXt and primetime-crop.pdf from lualatex). > The prime character looks more slanted in ConTeXt. It also almost > looks like it is cut horizontally at the bottom of the character. > Also, the space between the two x in the subscript looks a bit large > to me. Is that easily tuned? ConTeXt uses the OpenType version of the Latin Modern math font while your LaTeX file uses the older Type1 version of the font which uses multiple files for the different sizes. You can see this when look into the document information which can be done with your PDF viewer (or a command line tool like pdffonts). Wolfgang --------------21F673E82DCC25E2BE1BC48E Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mikael P. Sundqvist schrieb am 05.03.2020 um 20:48:
Oh, I had not. It looks better with collapsing=1, indeed. A few neq questions comes to me:

Does ConTeXt not use the same prime character as in TeX/LaTeX? Or has something changed in latin modern? See the attached pdf files (derivatives.pdf from ConTeXt and primetime-crop.pdf from lualatex). The prime character looks more slanted in ConTeXt. It also almost looks like it is cut horizontally at the bottom of the character. Also, the space between the two x in the subscript looks a bit large to me. Is that easily tuned?

ConTeXt uses the OpenType version of the Latin Modern math font
while your LaTeX file uses the older Type1 version of the font
which uses multiple files for the different sizes. You can see this
when look into the document information which can be done
with your PDF viewer (or a command line tool like pdffonts).

Wolfgang

--------------21F673E82DCC25E2BE1BC48E-- --===============6660033041471637666== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSWYgeW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBvZiBpbnRlcmVz dCB0byBvdGhlcnMgYXMgd2VsbCwgcGxlYXNlIGFkZCBhbiBlbnRyeSB0byB0aGUgV2lraSEKCm1h aWxsaXN0IDogbnRnLWNvbnRleHRAbnRnLm5sIC8gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5udGcubmwvbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9udGctY29udGV4dAp3ZWJwYWdlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHJhZ21hLWFkZS5ubCAv IGh0dHA6Ly9jb250ZXh0LmFhbmhldC5uZXQKYXJjaGl2ZSAgOiBodHRwczovL2JpdGJ1Y2tldC5v cmcvcGhnL2NvbnRleHQtbWlycm9yL2NvbW1pdHMvCndpa2kgICAgIDogaHR0cDovL2NvbnRleHRn YXJkZW4ubmV0Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCg== --===============6660033041471637666==--