From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/38586 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Pascal de Bruijn" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Installing Type 1 fonts into ConTeXt Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:00 +0100 Message-ID: <36121a670801111138o756a1cc2pb7ea093e93b0e7be@mail.gmail.com> References: <36121a670801111058h6c754ad4j26fe147538103a2e@mail.gmail.com> <4787C2BE.3020609@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1154225944==" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200080313 29897 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2008 19:38:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:38:33 +0000 (UTC) To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Jan 11 20:38:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JDPiQ-0001TE-B3 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305A71FC2F; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:30 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07567-04-9; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A301FBC6; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:22 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156111FC00 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07567-04-8 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E501FB6D for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so1972373fkq.2 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:38:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr4435461huf.56.1200080280871; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:38:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.78.196.2 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:38:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4787C2BE.3020609@elvenkind.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:38586 Archived-At: --===============1154225944== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2759_14847973.1200080280866" ------=_Part_2759_14847973.1200080280866 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Jan 11, 2008 8:25 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > > > > Does anybody have a clue why the first define went sour? Which tool is > used > > to extract the metadata from the .pfb files? > > Looks like a typing error in the pfb rename of 0018a___.pfb: it should > be named zhum601bi.pfb (note the 'm'). Is renaming required? I got the fonts from a CorelDRAW cdrom. I used the files as is. Anyway other font collections also have deviating filenames, and they work just fine. Regards, Pascal de Bruijn ------=_Part_2759_14847973.1200080280866 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Jan 11, 2008 8:25 PM, Taco Hoekwater <taco@elvenkind.com> wrote:
Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
>
> Does anybody have a clue why the first define went sour? Which tool is used
> to extract the metadata from the .pfb files?

Looks like a typing error in the pfb rename of  0018a___.pfb: it should
be named zhum601bi.pfb (note the 'm').

Is renaming required?  I got the fonts from a CorelDRAW cdrom. I used the files as is.

Anyway other font collections also have deviating filenames, and they work just fine.

Regards,
Pascal de Bruijn
------=_Part_2759_14847973.1200080280866-- --===============1154225944== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --===============1154225944==--