From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/182
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: ConTeXt: math formulars + framed/grey background
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 17:23:12 +0200
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <3628B660.86FFF293@gmx.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391050 21849 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:37:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:37:30 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:182
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:182

Hi,

> though. I'd prefer something like \radical[...=...]{n}{x}.  Let me
> return on this later, OK? Hans, please don't implement anything yet.

BTW: What's about \fraction{}{} (or actually '{\fraction{}{}}') of
context vs. {...\over...} of plain, which should be favoured?

Tobias