From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/251 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: documentatie texexec Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 09:12:23 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <36400C67.3740391F@wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391117 22442 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:38:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: "W.H. Dekker" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:251 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:251 W.H. Dekker wrote: > > where do I find documentation for texexec? > > I tried (in linux): > > texexec -help > > and got: > > TeXExec 1.1 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA 1997-1998 > > warning : ././texexec.ini not found > > Is -help not yet implemented? It is. Currently texexec searches texexec.ini (is in the distribution) on the path where texexec.pl is present. You need to set up this ini file (not that hard to do for a perl expert like you). Recently Thomas Esser and I discussed how to give tex* a place inthe texmf tree and he proposed a closer integration with web2c (especially using its path search mechanism). So, in the next tetex release context will be more integrated than currently. In this respect, suggestions are welcome. Furthermore, I suggest to use pdftex instead of normal tex: gives you dvi and pdf where texexec sorts things out. There is a new update of pdftex (see www.tug.org) or the tetex update site. Hans Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | mail: pragma@wxs.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------