From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/263 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tobias Burnus Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: [Context] Math Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 15:58:05 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3655837C.418F051D@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391128 22534 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:38:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: NTG-ConTeXt Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:263 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:263 Hi, how can I print this __n__ | | | | i | | i=1 (Similar to \sum, but not adding but multipling. While \sum is a \Sigma, this product sign is a \Pi.) Is there a simple way typesetting this A = B } } => A=C B = C } i.e. if I have two equations and a third can be concluded from the two. [this ,}' cascade was ment as one big brace] I might miss something, but how is \setupformulas supposed to work?: \stelleformelnein[position=links,links=LText,rechts=RText] appears as [formula] LTextRText and \stelleformelnein[position=links] [formula] (1) BTW: Is there a simple methode to have math formulas left justify? And how can I have something like this: \item $$xxx$$ without getting this result: 12. xxx Tobias