Re: ConTeXt: Math displ: $$ vs.\startformula

[Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de>]

Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Removing the % after \platziereformel here should remove the problem.
> \platziereformel gobbles an extra argument to get rid of a possible
> space between itself and the start of the formula. This fails if the
> next thing is a macro instead of a 'tex command' like $$ and the is NO
> space.

Well using
\platziereformel[alpha]{a}
$$
\int x\,{\rm d}x
$$
\bye

works, but this doesn't:
\platziereformel[alpha]{a}
\startformel
\int x\,{\rm d}x
\stopformel
\bye

!> Runaway argument?
!> a \startformel \int x\,{\rm d}x \stopformel \bye 
!> ! Paragraph ended before \dodoplaatsformule was complete.
!> <to be read again> 
!>                   \par 
!> l.6 

-----------------------
[mframed]
>  TB> It looks as if the former is printed in textstyle.
> 
> There is. We were at Dante, so this reply is a little late.
Doesn't matter, I simply used \displaystyle. Did they like eetex?
\formulenummer
Tobias