From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/335
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: ConTeXt: Math displ: $$ vs.\startformula
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 13:51:12 +0100
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <36D7EA40.D2940FB8@gmx.de>
References: <36D30927.84DF032A@gmx.de> <14039.51968.660000.448678@PC709>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391196 23191 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:39:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: NTG-ConTeXt <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Original-To: Taco Hoekwater <taco.hoekwater@wkap.nl>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:335
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:335

Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Removing the % after \platziereformel here should remove the problem.
> \platziereformel gobbles an extra argument to get rid of a possible
> space between itself and the start of the formula. This fails if the
> next thing is a macro instead of a 'tex command' like $$ and the is NO
> space.

Well using
\platziereformel[alpha]{a}
$$
\int x\,{\rm d}x
$$
\bye

works, but this doesn't:
\platziereformel[alpha]{a}
\startformel
\int x\,{\rm d}x
\stopformel
\bye

!> Runaway argument?
!> a \startformel \int x\,{\rm d}x \stopformel \bye 
!> ! Paragraph ended before \dodoplaatsformule was complete.
!> <to be read again> 
!>                   \par 
!> l.6 

-----------------------
[mframed]
>  TB> It looks as if the former is printed in textstyle.
> 
> There is. We were at Dante, so this reply is a little late.
Doesn't matter, I simply used \displaystyle. Did they like eetex?
\formulenummer
Tobias