From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/381 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tobias Burnus Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Definitions Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 23:41:54 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <37111722.8ABAB263@gmx.de> References: <370F1DDF.DDBE8340@wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391245 23626 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:40:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: NTG-CONTEXT Original-To: Hans Hagen Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:381 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:381 Hallo Hans, hi others, > The definition is defined in the same way as tobias did, but we combine > the definition with the settings: > > \definierenummerierung > [definition] > [text=Definition, > platz=kleinerabstand, > kopfstil=\sc, > breite=breit, > abschnittsnummer=ja, > art=prokapitel] > > The lemma inherit their settings from definition and get one additional > setting. > > \definierenummerierung > [lemma] > [definition] > [text=Lemma] Hmmm, why do I get DEFINITION 1.1 but LEMMA 1? I even tried to add ``abschnittsnummer=ja,art=prokapitel'' after the Lemma, but it didn't worked. (Now I use the individuel definition, w/o inheriting anything.) Groeten, Gruß, Regards, Tobias PS: This is with context version 1999-04-11. -- Tobias Burnus Troppauer Str. 15 12205 Berlin "This above all: To thine own self be true / And it must follow as the day the night / Thou canst not then be false to anyone." Polonius to Laertis (Hamlet) Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ (Petition to the EP)