From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/382 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Definitions Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 12:36:18 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3711CCA2.7AE62B8B@wxs.nl> References: <370F1DDF.DDBE8340@wxs.nl> <37111722.8ABAB263@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391246 23635 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:40:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: NTG-CONTEXT Original-To: Tobias Burnus Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:382 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:382 Tobias Burnus wrote: > Hmmm, why do I get DEFINITION 1.1 but LEMMA 1? > I even tried to add ``abschnittsnummer=ja,art=prokapitel'' after the Lemma, but > it didn't worked. (Now I use the individuel definition, w/o inheriting > anything.) Hm. I'll send you a changed \special@@definitiewoord to test This kind of inheritance is only usefull if you want to use the same number for all, whichis probbaly not what you want. Anyway, Taco will be glad that you noticed this bug, because he uses ths kind of coupling. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------