From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/732 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Which implementation. Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:19:59 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <37C1588F.2AF907BE@wxs.nl> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391575 26568 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:46:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Tarik Kara Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:732 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:732 Tarik Kara wrote: > Thanks for the reply to my guestion regarding installing Contex under > Miktex (I haven't tried it yet but I will tonight). Now I have a guestion > which is not directly related to ConTeXt. > Which TeX implementation whould you recommend for use under win9X and (if > other then MikTeX) from where can I download it. > > Once again, thank you all I use tetex on linux and fptex on windows (www pointers at our site). The advantage is that both are rather compatible and (for me important) also enable me to smoothly intergrate metapost graphics at runtime. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------