From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/1595
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Willadt@t-online.de (Peter Willadt)
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: FLOWchart trouble
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:25:09 +0100
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <388EE7A5.45456AFC@t-online.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035392415 1687 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:00:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:00:15 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: Context-Liste <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:1595
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:1595

Hello,

using two flowcharts with \comment s attached to the connections in one
document I observed that the \comment statements seem to be dependent of
each other. In particular, the first flow chart gets only as much
comments as the second and (even worse) the comments show up in exactly
the same positions as they should do for the second flowchart.

Currently I use the latest context, but the trouble seems to have been
there earlier too. The flowcells are named in unique ways.

I would be very glad for any help.

Peter Willadt