Re: analyzing type-otf.tex

[Henning Hraban Ramm <hraban@fiee.net>]

Am 2008-04-07 um 12:58 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
> To Hraban: encoding=uc has *zero* effect. To be honest - I doubt that
> you will be able to extract any more than (theoretical limit of) 256
> glyphs from the Type1 font with XeTeX - character slots and font
> glyphs are in one-to-one correlation, so I doubt that you can access
> the glyphs outside of those 256 slots (unless you make tfm & map
> files, but that's probably the reason why one wants to use XeTeX - to
> get rid of that encoding mess). So: I guess that Latin-1 works, but
> encoding=uc is ignored anyway.

Oh? I thought uc encoding would magically enhance my type1 fonts with  
full unicode range...
;-)

Thanks for the clarification - I wasn't sure if I'd need "uc", but  
since it worked this way, I left it there.


Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________