From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2471
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Michal Kvasnicka <qasar@econ.muni.cz>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: TT Fonts in PDFTeX
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:39:28 +0200
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <3993C9D0.9C41A797@econ.muni.cz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393261 9094 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:14:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:14:21 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: Context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2471
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2471

Hello,

still one more question. Let's say I have some fonts both in Type1 and
in TrueType.
(I really have.) I can prepare good .tfm metrics form .afm metrics.
But what should I include to PDF, Type1 fonts or TrueType ones? Is the
TrueType
faster and smaller, or not? Is it printable on Unix (and postscript
printers)?
Are there some more bugs? Is it worth of rewriting font-maps?

Many thanks
Michal Kvasnicka

--
Economics is the only field in which two people can get a Nobel Prize
for saying exactly the opposite things.