From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2480 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Berend de Boer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: lists Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:18:52 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <39954EBC.8E879FE4@pobox.com> References: <14741.10979.546878.849069@bitmuis.thuis.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393270 9205 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:14:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@let.uu.nl Original-To: Siep Kroonenberg Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2480 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2480 siepo@client44-3.kabelA.oprit.rug.nl wrote: > Why am I getting extra whitespace above the level-2 itemize and what > can I do about it? This is caused by the vanelkaar optie I suspect. But I'm unsure about the cause. It looks like a bug, but it could be a feature, i.e the \som ends with a new \startopsomming, so there should be some white space. But a more intuitive definition of vanelkaar is probably some white space above a \som except the first \som. And it doesn't look easy to resolve with an extra \vskip as you probably found out... Groetjes, Berend. (-: