From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2498 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Berend de Boer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: replies Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 21:20:02 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <399C3AE2.56F23053@pobox.com> References: <14741.8774.386846.462340@bitmuis.thuis.nl> <39952723.740F14A4@pobox.com> <39958723.6F016F12@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393287 9355 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:14:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Hraban , ConTeXt Original-To: Ed L Cashin Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2498 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2498 Ed L Cashin wrote: > Munging the email headers is a kludge to support broken email > clients. > > An email client should provide a "reply to all" feature which will > reply to the author and the list. Having to hit a different button depending on broken mailing list servers is my idea of a kludge :-) Groetjes, Berend. (-: