From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2689 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: S2P development Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Bold math Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:18:27 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <39BF7EA3.4AFB2A5F@wkap.nl> References: <39BF326C.862270E3@econ.muni.cz> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393461 10931 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:17:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: Context Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2689 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2689 Michal Kvasnicka wrote: > > Good morning. > > I'd like to ask when the \boldsymbol in math-module will work. > Does it work with the beta version of ConTeXt? Probably not. \boldsymbol (as well as \boldmath) depend on font mapping definitions of the five extra fonts, as in this example for Lucida: \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathRoman] [LucidaBright-Demi] \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathExtension] [LucidaNewMath-Extension] \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathItalic] [LucidaNewMath-AltDemiItalic] \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathSymbol] [LucidaNewMath-Symbol-Demi] \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathAlpha] [LucidaNewMath-Arrows-Demi] For Computer Modern, it would be something like this (untested): \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathRoman] [cmbx10] \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathExtension] [cmex10] \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathItalic] [cmmib10] \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathSymbol] [cmbsy10] \definefontsynonym [ExtraMathAlpha] [msam10] If you add these commands to the top of your input file, \boldsymbol *should* work Greetings, Taco