From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2781 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michal Kvasnicka Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Two questions on Context Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:57:11 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <39C9DB77.BCE2A233@econ.muni.cz> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393555 11767 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:19:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: Context Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2781 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2781 Dear friends, let me ask these simple questions: 1) Is \em just a font switch, or is it macro? I.e. is it necessary to write `{\em some text\/}' or is sufficient to write `{\em some text}'? 2) How can I find what hyphenation pattern is currently used? Many thanks, M.K. -- Economics is the only field in which two people can get a Nobel Prize for saying exactly the opposite things.