From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2966 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hraban Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: ConTeXt: Propsal for handling the =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DF?= (sharp s)and uppercase in general Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 21:01:51 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <39E75C0D.1D7532F4@gmx.net> References: <39D8C19F.2CAB842F@gmx.de> Reply-To: angerweit@gmx.net NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393735 13190 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:22:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ConTeXt Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2966 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2966 Tobias Burnus wrote: > after the discussion of the sharp s issue last week, I wrote a summery > about this topic and made some suggestions. Kleiner Fehler: Das runde (kurze) s erscheint *nur* am Ende einer Silbe! Das lange s ist (im Fraktursatz) der Standard. Ferner: Ich als Setzer würde "SZ" nur dann verwenden, wenn "SS" zu Missverständnissen führte. Little mistake: The short s must only be used at the end of a syllable. Within gothic setting the long s is standard. Further: Me as a typesetter would use "SZ" only if "SS" would lead to misunderstanding. -- Grüßlis vom Hraban! --- http://angerweit.tikon.ch/