From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3023 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: S2P development Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: about non-existent options Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:09:33 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <39ED92FD.3597F97B@wkap.nl> References: <3.0.6.32.20001018100959.01655da0@pop.wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393787 13647 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:23:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3023 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3023 Hans Hagen wrote: > > At 01:27 AM 10/18/00 +0200, Denis B. Roegel wrote: > >If I write > > > >\framed[framed=off,background=lions] > > > >I get a frame, apparently because ``framed=off'' is considered nil. > >I should have written ``frame=off''. It would be nice if this led > >to an explicit error. > > I once had something like that running [years ago] but the overhead was too > large, also in resources. Maybe some day ... Perhaps we could create a special 'debug' version of context? Even if it is a completely different format, like cont-end instead of cont-en (d for debug). It would be handy sometimes to verify that your syntax is correct (even if it does run very very slow, it will still be faster than 'tracingall' and much more comprehensible) Greetings, Taco