From: Hraban <angerweit@gmx.net>
Subject: Documentation Tasks (was: beginner's questions)
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 15:04:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A0EA36A.34730B16@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A0DA106.B76033F2@pobox.com>
Berend de Boer wrote:
> I can't believe the latex docs are better. And consistency across the
> (docs of the) many packages??
They are better, because there are many buyable books on it,
even in german ;-)
But you are right: None of this books covers all packages,
and some packages are nearly undocumented.
But further there are more people you can ask...
> But could you be a bit more specific about "hard to find my way around
> it." Because that is at least true for one person in this world, and if
> there is one there are more. So if you can (try to) formulate what kind
> of documentation would have helped you, perhaps this situation can be
> improved.
I miss such a elaborated FAQ like the german LaTeX-FAQ, that covers
really most questions.
I miss a table of the useable accents and symbols (math and other).
I miss german docs. (Sorry, my english is a bit poor, and complicated
matter is better to be understood without dictionary...)
I miss a how-to-use-fonts introduction for dummies. (That's a critical
point in LaTeX, too.) It should answer: What files for what type of
fonts are needed, how can I make/get them, where must they go etc.
I know that this is different on every system (and many of my problems
may be caused by my deficient knowledge of Linux/X)...
The beta manual could have hyperlinks (that would make its use easier).
Further: It lists not all options of the commands, but some are/seem
nowhere explained. (You've to try around a while.)
Beside of these critics the beta manual is already better than many
LaTeX books! (Siep, you may like the Companion -- at least the german
translation is a bit chaotic.)
At this state I can't convince publishing professionals to work
with ConTeXt. Even if the local (La)Tex users group was excited
about the nice ConTeXt code -- they asked too much questions that
I couldn't answer or that I knew to be a problem (yet). And they
said ConTeXt would be known to be slow.
I don't only want to grumble -- I'm willing to co-work on the docs,
but I must find some time first... :-(
Thank you very much again, Hans -- I can't understand how you manage
to earn money beside all your helpful work! ;-)
Grüßlis vom Hraban!
---
http://angerweit.tikon.ch/lieder/
http://www.planet-interkom.de/fiee.visuelle/formelsammlung.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-12 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-09 16:51 beginner's questions Wouter Verheijen
2000-11-09 17:20 ` Frans Goddijn
2000-11-09 17:54 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-09 17:40 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-09 19:25 ` Ed L Cashin
2000-11-11 17:34 ` siepo
2000-11-11 17:56 ` Frans Goddijn
2000-11-24 12:51 ` Christopher Tipper
2000-11-11 19:41 ` Berend de Boer
2000-11-12 11:34 ` siepo
2000-11-12 18:56 ` Denis B. Roegel
2000-11-13 9:37 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-13 16:54 ` multi-column spread control (was Re: beginner's questions) Ed L Cashin
2000-11-13 17:17 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-13 18:43 ` Ed L Cashin
2000-11-13 18:44 ` Ed L Cashin
2000-11-14 7:49 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-14 13:27 ` Ed L Cashin
2000-11-14 14:13 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-14 14:49 ` Ed L Cashin
2000-11-14 15:49 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-14 16:45 ` Ed L Cashin
2000-11-14 17:12 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-14 18:25 ` Ed L Cashin
2000-11-15 0:23 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-15 1:15 ` Ed L Cashin
2000-11-15 17:20 ` voting & form design (was: multi-column spread control) Hraban
2000-11-14 21:51 ` multi-column spread control (was Re: beginner's questions) Denis B. Roegel
2000-11-15 0:20 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-15 23:28 ` Denis B. Roegel
2000-11-19 19:31 ` Hans Hagen
2000-11-12 14:04 ` Hraban [this message]
2000-11-13 7:38 ` beginner's questions Hans Hagen
2000-11-13 21:26 ` siepo
2000-11-09 19:19 ` Berend de Boer
[not found] <Hans Hagen's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:12:11 +0100">
[not found] ` <Hans Hagen's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:49:12 +0100">
[not found] ` <Hans Hagen's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:13:29 +0100">
[not found] ` <Hans Hagen's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2000 08:49:03 +0100">
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A0EA36A.34730B16@gmx.net \
--to=angerweit@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).