From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/67112 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: mathew Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Difference between MKII, XeTeX and MKIV Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:54:47 -0500 Message-ID: <3A66E444-F747-4661-9D7E-AEFBCDA172B0@pobox.com> References: <20110314191304.1156c8b8@glyph> <20110314194427.174629dc@glyph> <20110314224913.09170743@glyph> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300416917 19088 80.91.229.12 (18 Mar 2011 02:55:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:55:17 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Mar 18 03:55:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0PqH-0000bE-HR for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:55:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED29CCAAEE; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:55:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id c-RdliFwOo9j; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:55:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DCACAAE2; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:55:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B38CAAE2 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:55:01 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HfRGNHlitbQy for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:54:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter1-til.mf.surf.net (filter1-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.217]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AA8CAAE1 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:54:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com (mail-gx0-f169.google.com [209.85.161.169]) by filter1-til.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p2I2spxa017568 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:54:52 +0100 Original-Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so1832977gxk.14 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:54:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=MbPBcQWNBqJwDq9/qy6nfEl/rAVloWNUOZ7Lo+FIi/M=; b=unU4PojfRCa/ROIlnSAznDoBv3OyVEYoc+MNmgoeLjzz9CyUH0Z2dtsBhgnDCZB4PA tGyU2hnzibfUNxh4vv3TO8ECD+rcnWXtI7/cDXudG9wvvZhtZmqxHQVg6TYwQ4/OnpFa EonREapuV+nPBpUkbYEYKhXs4jyHAdTTmJ6e4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=Hfi16Oz9XvAPAFJiJUVvqN1Th0ipk8JgBoDvJ0UzvAViT/pTdfaJ6w9z7JoysLcoSU ufz+vJyKSdVtk8OzNFKqjrSFt/DBjqBZKlRbTpHL5qk19fHchR8a71U7JJ37Uf1JDmKL INvt6n6TrYT4xsxQqd60tT68wS3G52w3b3NrM= Original-Received: by 10.91.199.7 with SMTP id b7mr634724agq.116.1300416890929; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.0.1.11] (cpe-66-25-174-43.austin.res.rr.com [66.25.174.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 35sm1301671ano.31.2011.03.17.19.54.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:54:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110314224913.09170743@glyph> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=209.85.161.169; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 08EkqSPJU - e06094904fbf - 20110318 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.217 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:67112 Archived-At: On Mar 14, 2011, at 16:49, Marco wrote: > I totally agree. But Cecil mentioned in another thread: =BBMy document is= mostly > text.=AB Even if a few mp graphics are involved luatex is still noticeably > slower. I look at it from the perspective that the last time I used TeX, my 8MHz At= ari ST took several seconds to process each page. And then it took several = seconds per page for the previewer to show me the DVI. And I couldn't do an= ything else on the machine while it was working. My way of working now is that I keep a short scratchpad document in TeXwork= s, and use it to sort out my formatting and macros, taking advantage of the= live preview. When I'm done, I copy the definitions into my actual working= document, which I edit in vim. I only typeset the entire working document = once or twice an hour, if that; vim catches syntax errors. So if LuaTex tak= es a few seconds longer to do the typesetting, it's completely unimportant. mathew ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________