From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3858 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Footnotes in footnotes Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:15:13 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3A6FEEA1.3360AB3B@elvenkind.com> References: <000001c08650$5ac8f940$a3ccfea9@nuovo> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394569 20746 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:36:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3858 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3858 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > > As of subject. I browsed the past messages, and I've seen that Hans Hagen was working on it ... so, is it somewhat possible? (maybe > a decoupling of the command like \footnotemark/footnotetext in LaTeX?) This decoupling would be a good idea in some other circumstances as well. -- groeten, Taco