From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4571
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Peter Jander" <pj@orc.soton.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: BIBTEX module for Context
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:14:12 GMT
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <3AE3F2CE.27105.24AD04@localhost>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395226 26824 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:47:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: ConTeXt List <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4571
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4571

Hi,

your lit-verz.bib file is not a bib file after all. The first entry is already 
in .bbl format ao if you rename the file to lit-bibl.bbl the first 
reference comes out ok.

The secong entry is a mixture of .bbl (\startpublication) and .bib 
file(the entries) which is no good.

You will only need to run BIBTEX if you have a genuine BIBTEX file 
with entries like @BOOK{...}. If you format all your references like 
the first, then you are allright without running BIBTEX.

Hope this helps,
Peter 

P.S. And check the \setuppublications bit as well.It didn't work 
when I renamed the file as lit-verz.bbl but I can't figure out why, 
because I don't have the docs here.