From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4770 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Environments, Projects, Products, Components Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:51:42 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3B15F80E.945B50C9@elvenkind.com> References: <15816128813.20010530134008@bigfoot.com> <3B150E38.6060605@elvenkind.com> <25874768.20010530200158@bigfoot.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395411 28623 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:50:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Giuseppe Bilotta Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4770 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4770 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > > Wednesday, May 30, 2001 Taco Hoekwater wrote: > > I see. Hadn't thought of that ... which do you think is the better > idea? taking \product off is space-saving (only one file per > chapter, instead of two wrappers plus the file), but somehow seems > less structuring ... maybe I'd better keep \product in until I > need to use the same file somewhere else ... > > What happens if product booka meets a component that says \product > bookb? If I understand correctly, nothing. I *think* \product is in there to allow partial compile of the component. But I not sure and I've never used this stuff so I am just doing a guess here. -- groeten, Taco