ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "A. Villaveces" <avillave@007mundo.com>
Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: pdf not read by acrobat ?!?!?
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 23:26:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B60ED77.CE752857@007mundo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20010718115853.02b757e0@server-1>

Sorry for the long delay, Hans, Hraban and you all! I was away from
Bogota, in
a place with no really workable connection for some days! Here are some
answers,
questions and followup.

Hans Hagen wrote:
> 
> At 03:58 PM 7/17/2001 -0500, A. Villaveces wrote:
> 
> >I have produced recently a very nice document with ConTeXt, loaded with
> >graphics. I always open it locally with xpdf, which renders it
> >perfectly. I tried to open the same document under Acrobat Reader, and
> >for some reason the reader claims there is some error with the document.
> >
> >This only happens with this new, ConTeXt-produced document (otherwise
> >Acrobat works normally). And the document seems ok (as xpdf can read it
> >perfectly).
> 
> which version of pdftex / context / acrobat?

pdftex: 3.14159-13d-2.1 (Web2C 7.3.1)
context: 2000.1.31 fmt: 2001.7.10
acrobat: 4.2

> 
> >Has anyone of you had this situation? Does anyone know what to do in
> >this case?
> >
> >(One reason I need to be able to open it is for quality printing: the
> >place where they have the good printers is windows-based, so I want them
> >to be able to open the file with Acrobat... unless anyone suggests some
> >other option).
> 
> There are problems with files produced by pdftex and acrobat 5.
> 
> (1) widgets, i adapted context
> (2) fonts, tom kacvinski adapted pdftex
> 
> although both are more adobe/acrobat problems, pdftex is now okay. The font
> problem had to do with the new cool type dll's not supporting subsetted
> encoding arrays in the proper way [and more]. I've run quite some
> complicated tests [most of this happened off line between
> fabrice/tom/me/few people] with many fonts and it seems to work ok. Another
> improvement of pdftex is that pdf inclusion is more efficient. [btw, in
> general, if you use the context figure base stuff mentioned on our site,
> figure inclusion is much faster anyway]. This means that page imposition
> [texexec etc] is very efficient now. This version of pdftex will go on
> texlive, and the windows version can be found at the fptex site.
> 
> So, if you have problems: take the latest context, pdftex and it should work.

Are there easy patches to the latest context and pdftex? How different
are they
from the versions I have? I would like to avoid having to rebuild from
the very base tetex!

Followup: after many other attempts (with the same system), I produced
later on a document readable by Acrobat. I cannot tell what essential
difference there was. I just kept working on the context document, until
at some point (days later) I tried again to visualize the new version on
Acrobat, and it worked! (it did not claim the file was corrupt as
before).

I have, however, a few other questions on context, but for the sake of
clarity, I prefer to ask them in a separate message.

Thanks for your help!

Andres Villaveces


  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-27  4:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-17  8:55 linux question Hans Hagen
2001-07-17 11:27 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2001-07-17 18:54   ` Hans Hagen
2001-07-17 20:58   ` pdf not read by acrobat ?!?!? A. Villaveces
2001-07-18 10:06     ` Hans Hagen
2001-07-27  4:26       ` A. Villaveces [this message]
2001-07-27  7:16         ` Hans Hagen
2001-07-18 11:28     ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2001-07-18 13:32       ` Hans Hagen
2001-07-27  4:33       ` wrong listoffigures name in spanish!!! A. Villaveces
2001-07-27  7:32         ` Hans Hagen
2001-07-27  4:38       ` a problem with left margin or edge A. Villaveces
2001-07-27  7:18         ` Hans Hagen
2001-07-27  4:44       ` nice left lines? A. Villaveces
     [not found]         ` <5.1.0.14.1.200107 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?17104534.02096e0?=8@server-1>
     [not found]           ` <2042 53540.2001 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?0717132727@bigfo?=ot.com>
2001-07-27  7:29         ` Hans Hagen
2001-07-27 16:59           ` doc shell (was: nice left lines?) Henning Hraban Ramm
2001-07-17 11:28 ` linux question Mohit Agarwal
2001-07-17 11:46 ` Taco Hoekwater
2001-07-17 18:51   ` Hans Hagen
2001-07-18  6:36     ` siep
2001-07-27 20:15     ` Berend de Boer
2001-07-27 22:22     ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2001-07-17 14:07 ` Tobias Burnus
2001-07-18 10:33   ` linux question / lucida fonts Hans Hagen
2001-07-17 20:52 ` linux question A. Villaveces
2001-07-18  9:58   ` Hans Hagen
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107171629530.24353-100000@fourier.aero.iisc .ernet.in>
2001-07-18  9:56   ` Hans Hagen
2001-07-18 11:33     ` siep
2001-07-18 15:36 ` Ed L Cashin
2001-07-27 20:13 ` Berend de Boer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B60ED77.CE752857@007mundo.com \
    --to=avillave@007mundo.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).