From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/5901
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Willadt@t-online.de (Peter Willadt)
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: m-chart spoils second flowchart
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:15:08 +0200
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <3BD47E4C.EAF63AF6@t-online.de>
References: <20011022183759.4912B52558@bart.math.muni.cz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035396464 5566 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:07:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:07:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Original-To: David Antos <antos@math.muni.cz>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:5901
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:5901

Hello,

> using m-chart, I have two flowcharts in a document. The problem is that
> lines of the first one are added to the second one, in addition to its own
> lines. Compiling each chart separately is absolutely OK. 
This problem seems to arise when MP is run BETWEEN TeX runs.
You have to enable \write18, so that TeX cann call MP during the TeX
run.
Most modern TeX distributions support this feature (of course, it opens
a security hole, too, but the tradeoff should not be that big), you just
have to switch it on.

Peter Willadt