From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/6692 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eckhart =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Guth=F6hrlein?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: suggestion Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:36:47 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3C51A5BF.9070008@uni-bielefeld.de> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20020125140431.033830f0@server-1> <87bsfi33y1.fsf@dellius.nederware.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397205 12857 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:20:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Hans Hagen , ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Berend de Boer Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:6692 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:6692 Berend de Boer wrote: > Hans Hagen writes: > > >>Does it make sense to summarize questions and answers (often more than >>one)? Of course this should be done by the one asking the question >>-) >> > > If you have someone who can gather these summarizations and publish > them once a month or so, you can get some FAQ after some time. > > It would surely be very useful to have a faq. The mail archives are surely valuable too, but a digest would definitely make sense. So, you just have to find a person who is sufficiently qualified, and this person has to have enough spare time which he/she is willing to donate to the task. Eckhart p.s.: I fulfil neither criterium, I think ;-)